• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Stanford Alliance for Primary Immunodeficiency

Stanford University

  • SAPI
  • Stanford PI Clinic
  • Patient Support
    • Diagnosis
    • Treatment and Complications
    • School
    • Work
    • Parenting
    • Sibling
    • Lifestyle
    • Mentorship Program
    • PI Resources
      • Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF)
      • Jeffrey Modell Foundation
      • Painted Turtle Camp
      • Make-A-Wish
      • Baxter IVIG
      • CSL Behring IVIG
  • Kids’ Zone
    • Kids’ Zone
    • Pre-Teen FAQ
    • Teen FAQ
  • PID Research
    • Butte Lab Immunology Research Projects
    • PID Research blog
  • Local Events
  • Donate
You are here: Home / Archives for Manish Butte

Manish Butte

Recent advances in primary immunodeficiency: from molecular diagnosis to treatment.

April 1, 2020 By Manish Butte

Related Articles

Recent advances in primary immunodeficiency: from molecular diagnosis to treatment.

F1000Res. 2020;9:

Authors: Bucciol G, Meyts I

Abstract
The technological advances in diagnostics and therapy of primary immunodeficiency are progressing at a fast pace. This review examines recent developments in the field of inborn errors of immunity, from their definition to their treatment. We will summarize the challenges posed by the growth of next-generation sequencing in the clinical setting, touch briefly on the expansion of the concept of inborn errors of immunity beyond the classic immune system realm, and finally review current developments in targeted therapies, stem cell transplantation, and gene therapy.

PMID: 32226610 [PubMed – in process]

Powered by WPeMatico

Filed Under: Research

Identification of human peripheral blood monocyte gene markers for early screening of solid tumors.

April 1, 2020 By Manish Butte

Related Articles

Identification of human peripheral blood monocyte gene markers for early screening of solid tumors.

PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0230905

Authors: Chen S, Liu M, Liang B, Ge S, Peng J, Huang H, Xu Y, Tang X, Deng L

Abstract
As cancer mortality is high in most regions of the world, early screening of cancer has become increasingly important. Minimally invasive screening programs that use peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are a new and reliable strategy that can achieve early detection of tumors by identifying marker genes. From 797 datasets, four (GSE12771, GSE24536, GSE27562, and GSE42834) including 428 samples, 236 solid tumor cases, and 192 healthy controls were chosen according to the inclusion criteria. A total of 285 genes from among 440 reported genes were selected by meta-analysis. Among them, 4 of the top significantly differentially expressed genes (ANXA1, IFI44, IFI44L, and OAS1) were identified as marker genes of PBMCs. Pathway enrichment analysis identified, two significant pathways, the ‘primary immunodeficiency’ pathway and the ‘cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction’ pathway. Protein- protein interaction (PPI) network analysis revealed the top 27 hubs with a degree centrality greater than 23 to be hub genes. We also identified 3 modules in Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) analysis: Cluster 1 (related to ANXA1), Cluster 2 (related to IFI44 and IFI44L) and Cluster 3 (related to OAS1). Among the 4 marker genes, IFI44, IFI44L, and OAS1 are potential diagnostic biomarkers, even though their results were not as remarkable as those for ANXA1 in our study. ANXA1 is involved in the immunosuppressive mechanism in tumor-bearing hosts and may be used in a new strategy involving the use of the host’s own immunity to achieve tumor suppression.

PMID: 32226026 [PubMed – in process]

Powered by WPeMatico

Filed Under: Research

COVID-19: Pandemic Contingency Planning for the Allergy and Immunology Clinic.

April 1, 2020 By Manish Butte

Related Articles

COVID-19: Pandemic Contingency Planning for the Allergy and Immunology Clinic.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Mar 26;:

Authors: Shaker MS, Oppenheimer J, Grayson M, Stukus D, Hartog N, Hsieh EWY, Rider N, Dutmer CM, Vander Leek TK, Kim H, Chan ES, Mack D, Ellis AK, Lang D, Lieberman J, Fleischer D, Golden DBK, Wallace D, Portnoy J, Mosnaim G, Greenhawt M

Abstract
In the event of a global infectious pandemic, drastic measures may be needed that limit or require adjustment of ambulatory allergy services. However, no rationale for how to prioritize service shut down and patient care exists. A consensus-based ad-hoc expert panel of allergy/immunology specialists from the United States and Canada developed a service and patient prioritization schematic to temporarily triage allergy/immunology services. Recommendations and feedback were developed iteratively, using an adapted modified Delphi methodology to achieve consensus. During the ongoing pandemic while social distancing is being encouraged, most allergy/immunology care could be postponed/delayed or handled through virtual care. With the exception of many patients with primary immunodeficiency, patients on venom immunotherapy, and patients with asthma of a certain severity, there is limited need for face-to-face visits under such conditions. These suggestions are intended to help provide a logical approach to quickly adjust service to mitigate risk to both medical staff and patients. Importantly, individual community circumstances may be unique and require contextual consideration. The decision to enact any of these measures rests with the judgment of each clinician and individual health care system. Pandemics are unanticipated, and enforced social distancing/quarantining is highly unusual. This expert panel consensus document offers a prioritization rational to help guide decision making when such situations arise and an allergist/immunologist is forced to reduce services or makes the decision on his or her own to do so.

PMID: 32224232 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Powered by WPeMatico

Filed Under: Research

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG Subclass Concentrations Differ According to Sex and Race.

April 1, 2020 By Manish Butte

Related Articles

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG Subclass Concentrations Differ According to Sex and Race.

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Mar 26;:

Authors: Harkness T, Fu X, Zhang Y, Choi HK, Stone JH, Blumenthal KG, Wallace ZS

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations are integral to the workup of immune deficiencies and IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). Demographic differences in IgG concentrations are poorly described but could influence test interpretation, contribute to racial disparities in primary immunodeficiency diagnosis, and explain demographic differences in IgG concentrations in IgG4-RD.
OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in IgG and IgG subclass concentrations according to sex and race.
METHODS: We identified patients with IgG and IgG subclass concentrations measured in a large healthcare system. Multivariate-adjusted differences in IgG and IgG subclass concentrations and the proportion of subjects with results outside of reference ranges according to sex and race were estimated.
RESULTS: Of the 12,851 patients, the mean age was 54.7 years and 7,917 (62%) were female. 11,673 (91%), 611 (5%), and 302 (2%) were White, Black, and Asian, respectively. Compared to White patients, Asian and Black patients had higher mean concentrations of IgG (1340.0 and 1504.4 vs. 988.1 mg/dL; p<0.001), IgG1 (782.0 and 938.4 vs. 592.4 mg/dL, p<0.001), IgG2 (493.5 and 384.2 vs. 305 mg/dL; p<0.001), IgG3 (76.6 and 91.9 vs. 55.9 mg/dL; p<0.001), and IgG4 (140.4 and 53.6 vs. 41.6 mg/dL; p<0.001). IgG4 concentrations were higher in males than females (56.3 vs. 37.4 mg/dL; p < 0.001). Similar observations were made when comparing the proportions of patients with results outside of reference ranges and after stratifying by diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: IgG and IgG subclass concentrations differ according to sex and race. These findings may have implications for the interpretation of these test results but require confirmation in diverse, healthy populations.

PMID: 32224206 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Powered by WPeMatico

Filed Under: Research

Recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor treatment for hereditary angioedema attacks in children.

April 1, 2020 By Manish Butte

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central Related Articles

Recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor treatment for hereditary angioedema attacks in children.

Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019 08;30(5):562-568

Authors: Reshef A, Grivcheva-Panovska V, Kessel A, Kivity S, Klimaszewska-Rembiasz M, Moldovan D, Farkas H, Gutova V, Fritz S, Relan A, Giannetti B, Magerl M

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Attacks of hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) usually begin during childhood or adolescence. However, limited data are available regarding indications and modalities of treatment of children. This study evaluated recombinant human C1-INH (rhC1-INH) for HAE attacks in children.
METHODS: This open-label, phase 2 study included children aged 2-13 years with C1-INH-HAE. Eligible HAE attacks were treated intravenously with rhC1-INH 50 IU/kg body weight (maximum, 4200 IU). The primary end-point was time to beginning of symptom relief (TOSR; ≥20 mm decrease from baseline in visual analog scale [VAS] score, persisting for two consecutive assessments); secondary end-point was time to minimal symptoms (TTMS; <20 mm VAS score for all anatomic locations).
RESULTS: Twenty children (aged 5-14 years; 73 HAE attacks) were treated with rhC1-INH. Seventy (95.9%) of the attacks were treated with a single dose of rhC1-INH. Seven (35.0%) children were treated for four or more attacks. Overall, median TOSR was 60.0 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.0-65.0); data were consistent across attacks. Median TTMS was 122.5 minutes (95% CI, 120.0-126.0); data were consistent across attacks. No children withdrew from the study due to adverse events. No treatment-related serious adverse events or hypersensitivity reactions were reported; no neutralizing antibodies were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant human C1-INH was efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in children. Data support use of the same dosing regimen for HAE attacks in children (50 IU/kg; up to 4200 IU, followed by an additional dose, if needed) as is currently recommended for adolescents and adults.

PMID: 30993784 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Powered by WPeMatico

Filed Under: Research

A randomized trial of human C1 inhibitor prophylaxis in children with hereditary angioedema.

April 1, 2020 By Manish Butte

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central Related Articles

A randomized trial of human C1 inhibitor prophylaxis in children with hereditary angioedema.

Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019 08;30(5):553-561

Authors: Aygören-Pürsün E, Soteres DF, Nieto-Martinez SA, Christensen J, Jacobson KW, Moldovan D, Van Leerberghe A, Tang Y, Lu P, Vardi M, Schranz J, Martinez-Saguer I

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction have burdensome recurrent angioedema attacks. The safety, efficacy, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes of C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) prophylaxis (intravenously administered) in patients aged 6-11 years were investigated.
METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled in a randomized, single-blind, crossover, phase 3 trial. After a 12-week baseline observation period (BOP), patients received 500 or 1000 U C1-INH, twice weekly, for 12 weeks before crossing over to the alternate dose for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end-point was the monthly normalized number of angioedema attacks (NNA). HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQoL 5-dimensional descriptive system youth version and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS).
RESULTS: Twelve randomized patients had a median (range) age of 10.0 (7-11) years. Mean (SD) percentage reduction in monthly NNA from BOP was 71.1% (27.1%) with 500 U and 84.5% (20.0%) with 1000 U C1-INH. Mean (SD) within-patient difference (-0.4 [0.58]) for monthly NNA with both doses was significant (P = 0.035 [90% CI, -0.706 to -0.102]). Cumulative attack severity, cumulative daily severity, and number of acute attacks treated were reduced. No serious adverse events or discontinuations occurred. Mean EQ-VAS change from BOP to week 9 of treatment (500 U C1-INH, 10.4; 1000 U C1-INH, 21.6) was greater than the minimal important difference, indicating a meaningful HRQoL change.
CONCLUSIONS: C1-INH prophylaxis was effective, safe, and well tolerated in children aged 6-11 years experiencing recurrent angioedema attacks. A post hoc analysis indicated a meaningful improvement in HRQoL with C1-INH.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02052141.

PMID: 30968444 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Powered by WPeMatico

Filed Under: Research

Current and emerging biologics for the treatment of hereditary angioedema.

April 1, 2020 By Manish Butte

Related Articles

Current and emerging biologics for the treatment of hereditary angioedema.

Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2019 06;19(6):517-526

Authors: Perego F, Wu MA, Valerieva A, Caccia S, Suffritti C, Zanichelli A, Bergamaschini L, Cicardi M

Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hereditary angioedema due to C1-INH deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) is a rare disease with unpredictable, self-limiting and localized swelling episodes involving the cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues. In the last decade, the spectrum of the possibilities to control the disease has considerably changed with the development of biologic therapies making necessary a careful evaluation of the differences among current and emerging treatments to properly optimize the management of patients.
AREAS COVERED: This review serves to summarize the literature regarding the use of biologics for the treatment of C1-INH-HAE. Medications already available on the market and new drugs in different phases of development are addressed.
EXPERT OPINION: The advent of biologic therapies dramatically improved the lives of patients with C1-INH-HAE although further improvement is still needed. Whether this is cost/effective will be answered in the next years when we will see if these major advances will benefit the majority of the patients.

PMID: 30912460 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Powered by WPeMatico

Filed Under: Research

Genetic diagnosis of autoinflammatory disease patients using clinical exome sequencing.

March 31, 2020 By Manish Butte

Related Articles

Genetic diagnosis of autoinflammatory disease patients using clinical exome sequencing.

Eur J Med Genet. 2020 Mar 25;:103920

Authors: Batlle-Masó L, Mensa-Vilaró A, Solís-Moruno M, Marquès-Bonet T, Arostegui JI, Casals F

Abstract
Autoinflammatory diseases comprise a wide range of syndromes caused by dysregulation of the innate immune response. They are difficult to diagnose due to their phenotypic heterogeneity and variable expressivity. Thus, the genetic origin of the disease remains undetermined for an important proportion of patients. We aim to identify causal genetic variants in patients with suspected autoinflammatory disease and to test the advantages and limitations of the clinical exome gene panels for molecular diagnosis. Twenty-two unrelated patients with clinical features of autoinflammatory diseases were analyzed using clinical exome sequencing (∼4800 genes), followed by bioinformatic analyses to detect likely pathogenic variants. By integrating genetic and clinical information, we found a likely causative heterozygous genetic variant in NFKBIA (p.D31N) in a North-African patient with a clinical picture resembling the deficiency of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, and a heterozygous variant in DNASE2 (p.G322D) in a Spanish patient with a suspected lupus-like monogenic disorder. We also found variants likely to increase the susceptibility to autoinflammatory diseases in three additional Spanish patients: one with an initial diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis who carries two heterozygous UNC13D variants (p.R727Q and p.A59T), and two with early-onset inflammatory bowel disease harbouring NOD2 variants (p.L221R and p.A728V respectively). Our results show a similar proportion of molecular diagnosis to other studies using whole-exome or targeted resequencing in primary immunodeficiencies. Thus, despite its main limitation of not including all candidate genes, clinical exome targeted sequencing can be an appropriate approach to detect likely causative variants in autoinflammatory diseases.

PMID: 32222431 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Powered by WPeMatico

Filed Under: Research

Severe combined immunodeficiency pig as an emerging animal model for human diseases and regenerative medicines.

March 31, 2020 By Manish Butte

Icon for PubMed Central Related Articles

Severe combined immunodeficiency pig as an emerging animal model for human diseases and regenerative medicines.

BMB Rep. 2019 Nov;52(11):625-634

Authors: Iqbal MA, Hong K, Kim JH, Choi Y

Abstract
Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is a group of inherited disorders characterized by compromised T lymphocyte differentiation related to abnormal development of other lymphocytes [i.e., B and/or natural killer (NK) cells], leading to death early in life unless treated immediately with hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Functional NK cells may impact engraftment success of life-saving procedures such as bone marrow transplantation in human SCID patients. Therefore, in animal models, a T cell-/B cell-/NK cell+ environment provides a valuable tool for understanding the function of the innate immune system and for developing targeted NK therapies against human immune diseases. In this review, we focus on underlying mechanisms of human SCID, recent progress in the development of SCID animal models, and utilization of SCID pig model in biomedical sciences. Numerous physiologies in pig are comparable to those in human such as immune system, X-linked heritability, typical T-B+NK- cellular phenotype, and anatomy. Due to analogous features of pig to those of human, studies have found that immunodeficient pig is the most appropriate model for human SCID. [BMB Reports 2019; 52(11): 625-634].

PMID: 31722780 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Powered by WPeMatico

Filed Under: Research

Lanadelumab Injection Treatment For The Prevention Of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE): Design, Development And Place In Therapy.

March 31, 2020 By Manish Butte

Icon for PubMed Central Related Articles

Lanadelumab Injection Treatment For The Prevention Of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE): Design, Development And Place In Therapy.

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:3635-3646

Authors: Bova M, Valerieva A, Wu MA, Senter R, Perego F

Abstract
Despite the efficacy of the on-demand treatment for the control of acute attacks of Hereditary Angioedema due to C1-Inhibitor Deficiency (C1-INH-HAE), the number and severity of attacks and the impairment in the quality of life of the affected patients have led to the development of a new monoclonal antibody, lanadelumab, directly addressed to the blockage of bradykinin, the principal mediator of vasodilation during angioedema attacks. It is indicated for the prophylactic treatment, it is easy to administer, highly effective and with known limited side effects. The current review summarizes the development of the drug, its clinical background and its perspectives.

PMID: 31695331 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Powered by WPeMatico

Filed Under: Research

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 398
  • Page 399
  • Page 400
  • Page 401
  • Page 402
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 712
  • Go to Next Page »

Copyright © 2026 · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress · Log in